在线一二区_国产精品一区不卡_黄色免费在线视频网站_91视频在线免费观看_成年大片40分钟免费视频播放_91视频高清免费

SAT写作的评分标准 全英文

雕龙文库 分享 时间: 收藏本文

SAT写作的评分标准 全英文

  我们今天来介绍一下SAT写作的评分标准,SAT写作是由两个人独立评分,1~6分,也就是你最后的得分在2~12分之间。关于写作,SAT的写作没有题库,但是据说和GRE的题库差不太多,就是没有GRE那么深。SAT的写作要求是纯粹的学术写作,提出观点、提出支持观点的论点、提出论据、最后总结。视题目的要求,可能会需要一个让步段。一般5段式为好。

  下面是SAT写作的评分标准,全英文的:

  SCORE OF 6

  An essay in this category is outstanding, demonstrating clear and consistent mastery, although it may have a few minor errors. A typical essay

  effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position

  is well organized and clearly focused, demonstrating clear coherence and smooth progression of ideas

  exhibits skillful use of language, using a varied, accurate, and apt vocabulary

  demonstrates meaningful variety in sentence structure

  is free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics

  SCORE OF 5

  An essay in this category is effective, demonstrating resonably consistent mastery, although it will have occasional errors or lapses in quality. A typical essay

  effectively develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates strong critical thinking, generally using appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position

  is well organized and focused, demonstrating coherence and progression of ideas

  exhibits facility in the use of language, using appropriate vocabulary

  demonstrates variety in sentence structure

  is generally free of most errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

  SCORE OF 4

  An essay in this category is competent, demonstrating adequate mastery, although it will have lapses in quality. A typical essay

  develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates competent critical thinking, using adequate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position

  is generally organized and forcused, demonstrating some coherence and progression of ideas

  exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language, using generally appropriate vocabulary

  demonstrates some variety in sentence structure

  has some errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

  SCORE OF 3

  An essay in this category is inadequate, but demonstrates developing mastery, and is marked by one or more of the following weaknesses

  develops a point of view on the issue, demonstrating some critical thinking, but may do so inconsistently or use inadequate examples, reasons, or other evidence to support its position

  is limited in its organization or focus, but may demonstrate some lapses in coherence or progression of ideas

  displays developing facility in the use of language, but sometimes uses weak vocabulary or inappropriate word choice

  lacks variety or demonstrates problems in sentence structure

  contains an accumulation of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

  SCORE OF 2

  An essay in this category is seriously limited, demonstrating little mastery, and is flawed by one or more of the following weaknesses

  develops a point of view on the issue that is vague or seriously limited, demonstrating weak critical thinking, providing inappropriate or insufficient examples, reasons, or other evidence to support its position

  is poorly organized and/or focused, or demonstrates serious problems with coherence or progreesion of ideas

  displays very little facility in the use of language, using very limited vocabulary or incorrect word choice

  demonstrates frequent problems in sentence structure

  contains errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics so serious that meaning is somewhat obscured

  SCORE OF 1

  An essay in this category is fundamentally lacking, demonstrating very little or no mastery, and is severely flawed by one or more of the following weaknesses:

  develops no viable point of view on the issue, or provides little or no evidence to support its position

  is disorganized or unfocused, resulting in a disjointed or incoherent essay

  displays fundamental errors in vocabulary

  demonstrates severe flaws in sentence structure

  contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that peresistently interfere with meaning

  SCORE OF 0

  Essays not written on the essay assignment will receive a score of zero

  以上就是SAT写作的评分标准,由此可见,要写一篇好的文章要做到逻辑清晰,观点明确,词汇丰富,句子多样,语法上没有大问题才可以。

  

  我们今天来介绍一下SAT写作的评分标准,SAT写作是由两个人独立评分,1~6分,也就是你最后的得分在2~12分之间。关于写作,SAT的写作没有题库,但是据说和GRE的题库差不太多,就是没有GRE那么深。SAT的写作要求是纯粹的学术写作,提出观点、提出支持观点的论点、提出论据、最后总结。视题目的要求,可能会需要一个让步段。一般5段式为好。

  下面是SAT写作的评分标准,全英文的:

  SCORE OF 6

  An essay in this category is outstanding, demonstrating clear and consistent mastery, although it may have a few minor errors. A typical essay

  effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position

  is well organized and clearly focused, demonstrating clear coherence and smooth progression of ideas

  exhibits skillful use of language, using a varied, accurate, and apt vocabulary

  demonstrates meaningful variety in sentence structure

  is free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics

  SCORE OF 5

  An essay in this category is effective, demonstrating resonably consistent mastery, although it will have occasional errors or lapses in quality. A typical essay

  effectively develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates strong critical thinking, generally using appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position

  is well organized and focused, demonstrating coherence and progression of ideas

  exhibits facility in the use of language, using appropriate vocabulary

  demonstrates variety in sentence structure

  is generally free of most errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

  SCORE OF 4

  An essay in this category is competent, demonstrating adequate mastery, although it will have lapses in quality. A typical essay

  develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates competent critical thinking, using adequate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position

  is generally organized and forcused, demonstrating some coherence and progression of ideas

  exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language, using generally appropriate vocabulary

  demonstrates some variety in sentence structure

  has some errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

  SCORE OF 3

  An essay in this category is inadequate, but demonstrates developing mastery, and is marked by one or more of the following weaknesses

  develops a point of view on the issue, demonstrating some critical thinking, but may do so inconsistently or use inadequate examples, reasons, or other evidence to support its position

  is limited in its organization or focus, but may demonstrate some lapses in coherence or progression of ideas

  displays developing facility in the use of language, but sometimes uses weak vocabulary or inappropriate word choice

  lacks variety or demonstrates problems in sentence structure

  contains an accumulation of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

  SCORE OF 2

  An essay in this category is seriously limited, demonstrating little mastery, and is flawed by one or more of the following weaknesses

  develops a point of view on the issue that is vague or seriously limited, demonstrating weak critical thinking, providing inappropriate or insufficient examples, reasons, or other evidence to support its position

  is poorly organized and/or focused, or demonstrates serious problems with coherence or progreesion of ideas

  displays very little facility in the use of language, using very limited vocabulary or incorrect word choice

  demonstrates frequent problems in sentence structure

  contains errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics so serious that meaning is somewhat obscured

  SCORE OF 1

  An essay in this category is fundamentally lacking, demonstrating very little or no mastery, and is severely flawed by one or more of the following weaknesses:

  develops no viable point of view on the issue, or provides little or no evidence to support its position

  is disorganized or unfocused, resulting in a disjointed or incoherent essay

  displays fundamental errors in vocabulary

  demonstrates severe flaws in sentence structure

  contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that peresistently interfere with meaning

  SCORE OF 0

  Essays not written on the essay assignment will receive a score of zero

  以上就是SAT写作的评分标准,由此可见,要写一篇好的文章要做到逻辑清晰,观点明确,词汇丰富,句子多样,语法上没有大问题才可以。

  

信息流广告 周易 易经 代理招生 二手车 网络营销 旅游攻略 非物质文化遗产 查字典 社区团购 精雕图 戏曲下载 抖音代运营 易学网 互联网资讯 成语 成语故事 诗词 工商注册 注册公司 抖音带货 云南旅游网 网络游戏 代理记账 短视频运营 在线题库 国学网 知识产权 抖音运营 雕龙客 雕塑 奇石 散文 自学教程 常用文书 河北生活网 好书推荐 游戏攻略 心理测试 石家庄人才网 考研真题 汉语知识 心理咨询 手游安卓版下载 兴趣爱好 网络知识 十大品牌排行榜 商标交易 单机游戏下载 短视频代运营 宝宝起名 范文网 电商设计 免费发布信息 服装服饰 律师咨询 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 经典范文 优质范文 工作总结 二手车估价 实用范文 古诗词 衡水人才网 石家庄点痣 养花 名酒回收 石家庄代理记账 女士发型 搜搜作文 石家庄人才网 钢琴入门指法教程 词典 围棋 chatGPT 读后感 玄机派 企业服务 法律咨询 chatGPT国内版 chatGPT官网 励志名言 河北代理记账公司 文玩 语料库 游戏推荐 男士发型 高考作文 PS修图 儿童文学 买车咨询 工作计划 礼品厂 舟舟培训 IT教程 手机游戏推荐排行榜 暖通,电地暖, 女性健康 苗木供应 ps素材库 短视频培训 优秀个人博客 包装网 创业赚钱 养生 民间借贷律师 绿色软件 安卓手机游戏 手机软件下载 手机游戏下载 单机游戏大全 免费软件下载 石家庄论坛 网赚 手游下载 游戏盒子 职业培训 资格考试 成语大全 英语培训 艺术培训 少儿培训 苗木网 雕塑网 好玩的手机游戏推荐 汉语词典 中国机械网 美文欣赏 红楼梦 道德经 标准件 电地暖 网站转让 鲜花 书包网 英语培训机构 电商运营
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产欧美日韩在线一区二区不卡 | 亚洲精品αv一区二区三区 亚洲精品白浆高清久久久久久 | 国产成人a∨激情视频厨房 国产成人aaaaa级毛片 | 91成人软件| 久久精品综合一区二区三区 | 一区二区三区国产亚洲网站 | 国产成人综合久久精品 | 欧美私人情侣网站 | 午夜视频高清在线aaa | 国产美女裸体丝袜喷水视频 | 精品亚洲午夜久久久久 | 西西人体在线视频 | 在线电影a | 一区高清 | 人人超碰人人爱超碰国产 | 亚洲国产成人影院播放 | 国产精品内射后入合集 | 超薄肉色丝袜一二三四区 | 视频在线观看一区 | 亚洲电影在线观看 | 欧美精品久久久久久久免费观看 | 激情偷乱人伦小说视频 | yellow视频在线免费观看 | 熟睡中被义子侵犯在线播放 | 自拍偷区亚洲综合美利坚 | 亚洲精品无码久久久久去q 亚洲精品无码久久久久牙蜜区 | 成人在线播放 | 污污的网址| 99精品欧美一区二区三区 | 男人扒开女人双腿猛进视频 | 国产极品美女到高潮 | 三a毛片 | 亚洲国产成人久久综合区 | 国产99热久久这里有精品999 | 久久只有这里有精品 | 久久免 | 日本激情在线看免费观看视频 | 国产人成视频在线视频 | 欧美中文娱乐网 | 国产精品久久久久久久影院 | 丰满少妇高潮惨叫正在播放 |