gre改革后新版gre写作新题库里的作文方面的一个重要变化是有了指导语。而指导语的作用是有助于我们的逻辑性写作，以下是新版gre写作新题库内有关argument86的写作部分：

　　题目：

　　The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company.

　　When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating rsums and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delanys services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not. Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year. Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices. After all, last year Delanys clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walshs clients took nine.

　　Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

　　中文翻译：

　　当XYZ裁员的时候，它雇佣了Delany人事公司在这些下岗员工有需要的时候为他们在写简历和提高面试技巧方面提供帮助。下岗员工从Delany的服务中极大受益：去年获得了Delany帮助的员工找工作比没有找Delany的员工快的多。最近，有提案提出用收费较少的Walsh人事公司代替Delany。这将是一个错误，因为在8年前，XYZ使用的就是Walsh，我们当时裁减的员工只有一半在一年之内找到了工作。而且，Delany显然更好，理由是它的员工更多，分支机构也更多。不论如何，去年Delany的客户平均用六个月找到工作，而Walsh的客户平均用了9个月。

　　写一篇回应，讨论还需要何种具体的证据才能更好的评估上面的论证，并解释这个证据是如何强化/削弱这篇文章的论证的。

　　此上就是新版gre写作新题库 argument86的内容从今天起小编就给大家连续提供新版gre写作新题库argument部分的内容。希望大家能够在练习中提高自己的写作水平。

　　gre改革后新版gre写作新题库里的作文方面的一个重要变化是有了指导语。而指导语的作用是有助于我们的逻辑性写作，以下是新版gre写作新题库内有关argument86的写作部分：

　　题目：

　　The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company.

　　When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating rsums and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delanys services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not. Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year. Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices. After all, last year Delanys clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walshs clients took nine.

　　Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

　　中文翻译：

　　当XYZ裁员的时候，它雇佣了Delany人事公司在这些下岗员工有需要的时候为他们在写简历和提高面试技巧方面提供帮助。下岗员工从Delany的服务中极大受益：去年获得了Delany帮助的员工找工作比没有找Delany的员工快的多。最近，有提案提出用收费较少的Walsh人事公司代替Delany。这将是一个错误，因为在8年前，XYZ使用的就是Walsh，我们当时裁减的员工只有一半在一年之内找到了工作。而且，Delany显然更好，理由是它的员工更多，分支机构也更多。不论如何，去年Delany的客户平均用六个月找到工作，而Walsh的客户平均用了9个月。

　　写一篇回应，讨论还需要何种具体的证据才能更好的评估上面的论证，并解释这个证据是如何强化/削弱这篇文章的论证的。

　　此上就是新版gre写作新题库 argument86的内容从今天起小编就给大家连续提供新版gre写作新题库argument部分的内容。希望大家能够在练习中提高自己的写作水平。