在线一二区_国产精品一区不卡_黄色免费在线视频网站_91视频在线免费观看_成年大片40分钟免费视频播放_91视频高清免费

淘金高阶英语六级巅峰阅读 篇章阅读17:智力测试

雕龙文库 分享 时间: 收藏本文

淘金高阶英语六级巅峰阅读 篇章阅读17:智力测试

  篇章阅读17:智力测试

  About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated.intelligence testing became unpopular.

  Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.

  However. paradoxically. just recently a group of black parents filed lawsuit(诉讼)in California claiming that the states ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test The judge, therefore. reversed, at least partially. his original decision.

  And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting. even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence. or whether some other factor is the cause.

  What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a childs physical condition or his intellectual level.

  Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago. for instance, white families were encouraged co adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.

  And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.

  As to intelligence. in our opinion, the more we know about any childs intellectual level, the better for the child in question.

  参考译文

  无论是什么背景的孩子,都应当保证受到公平的对待,当学校和其他机构对此都相当关心的时候,智力测试变得不流行了。

  有人认为智力测试对于少数民族孩子是不公平的。在过去的几十年里这种测试已经不再时髦,在很多社区实际上已经被禁止。

  然而,反常的是,在加利福尼亚,最近就有一群黑人父母提起诉讼,认为州政府禁止智商测试使他们的孩子得不到这种测试的机会,是对他们孩子的歧视。(他们正确地认为,智商测试是判断孩子是否适合特殊教育的一种有效方法。)因此法官至少是部分撤消了原判。

  这种争论就这样不断地继续下去。对少数民族的孩子来说,智力测试对他们有益还是有害?我们一直都对这种测试持支持的态度,甚至推动其实施。任何一种肤色或种族的孩子如果在学校表现不佳,对于我们来说,知道这是因为他或她的智力低下,还是别的什么原因是很重要的。

  为了改变孩子表现不佳,学校和家庭所能做的事情会受到这种的原因的影响。评价孩子的身体条件或智力水平不是歧视。

  令人遗憾的是,智力水平似乎是一个敏感的话题,而法律允许我们做的事情也会随时间的变化而变化。同样的反复也会出现在智力以外的其他领域。比如,大约在30年以前,白人家庭得到鼓励收养黑人儿童。否则就被认为是有种族歧视之嫌。

  后来这种时尚改变了,这种跨种族的收养一般不再流行,社会机构认为,黑人孩子只应回到黑人家庭。很难说什么方式是最好的,但是肯定需要我们所有人都表现出善意。

  就智力而言,我们的观点是,我们对任一个孩子的智力水平了解得越多,对这个孩子就越有利。

  测试题

  1. Why did the intelligence test become unpopular in the past few decades?

  A) Its validity was challenged by many communities.

  B) It was considered discriminative against minority children.

  C) It met with strong opposition from the majority of black parents.

  D) It deprived the black children of their rights to a good education.

  2. The recent legal action taken by some black parents in California aimed to

  A) draw public attention to IQ testing

  B) put an end to special education

  C) remove the states ban on intelligence tests

  D) have their children enter white schools

  3. The author believes that intelligence testing_____________.

  A) may ease racial confrontation in the United States

  B) can encourage black children to keep up with white children

  C) may seriously aggravate racial discrimination in the United States

  D) can help black parents make decisions about their children s education

  4. The authors opinion of child adoption seems to be that________________.

  A) no rules whatsoever can be prescribed

  B) white families should adopt black children

  C) adoption should be based on IQ test results

  D) cross-racial adoption is to be advocated

  5. Child adoption is mentioned in the passage to show that_________________.

  A) good will may sometimes complicate racial problems

  B)social surroundings are vital to the healthy growth of children

  C) intelligence testing also applies to non-academic areas

  D) American opinion can shift when it comes to sensitive issues

  选项翻译与答案详解

  1.过去的几十年当中,为什么智力测验不受欢迎?

  A)很多社群质疑智力测验的有效性。

  B)智力测验被视作歧视少数儿童。

  C)智力测验受到了来自大多数黑人父母的反对。

  D)智力测验剥夺了黑人孩子受良好教育的权利。

  根据文章第2段 有些人认为智力测验对少数民族儿童不公平。因此,在过去的几十年里,智力测验已不再流行,在有些社区甚至被禁止了 ,这里的it指代前面的intelligence testing。因此,B与文章所表达的意思一致。

  2.最近一些加州的黑人父母采取的法律行动是旨在__________________。

  A)引起大众对智力测验的关注 B)结束特殊教育

  C)消除加州的智力测验禁令 D)让自己的孩子进入白人学校就读

  根据文章第3段第2句 最近,一群黑人父母提出诉讼,声称该州禁止智商测验剥夺了他们的孩子接受这种测验的机会,是对孩子的歧视 ,由此可判断黑人父母要求取消对智力测试的禁令。故此,应该选C。

  3.作者认为智力测验________________。

  A)会缓和美国的种族对抗

  B)能够鼓励黑人孩子赶上白人该子

  C)会严重地激化美国的种族歧视

  D)可以帮助黑人家长决定孩子的教育问题

  根据文章第4段末句和第5段首句 如果任何一种肤色的小孩在学校的成绩不好,弄清楚是由于他的智商低.还是由于其他原因引起的对我们来说似乎很重要;学校和家庭只有弄清楚孩子成绩不好的原因才能帮助孩子 ,因此,应选D。

  4.作者对于收养儿童的意见似乎是____________________。

  A)没有什么法则可出台 B)白人家庭应该收养黑人孩子

  C)收养应该基于智力测验的结果之上 D)应该倡导跨种族收养

  根据文章第7段末句 因此,很难说到底怎样才是最好的。但肯定无疑的是,我们大家都需要有善意 ,由此可推断,人们并不能制定某种规则来限制它,故此,A与文章的意思相符。

  5.文章中提到收养儿童是为了显示_______________。

  A)良好的意愿有的时候会将种族问题复杂化

  B)社会环境对于儿童的健康成长至关重要

  C)智力测验对于非学术领域也同样适用

  D)美国人对于敏感议题的意见会发生变化

  文章第6段前两句,作者提出 智商水平似乎是个敏感的问题。法律允许我们不时改变观点。在智商以外的其他领域也存在着这种来来回回不断变化的情况 ,儿童收养问题只是作者举的一个例子,旨在说明在一些敏感问题上,人们的观点可以不断变化的情况。故选D。

  

  篇章阅读17:智力测试

  About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated.intelligence testing became unpopular.

  Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.

  However. paradoxically. just recently a group of black parents filed lawsuit(诉讼)in California claiming that the states ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test The judge, therefore. reversed, at least partially. his original decision.

  And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting. even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence. or whether some other factor is the cause.

  What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a childs physical condition or his intellectual level.

  Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago. for instance, white families were encouraged co adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.

  And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.

  As to intelligence. in our opinion, the more we know about any childs intellectual level, the better for the child in question.

  参考译文

  无论是什么背景的孩子,都应当保证受到公平的对待,当学校和其他机构对此都相当关心的时候,智力测试变得不流行了。

  有人认为智力测试对于少数民族孩子是不公平的。在过去的几十年里这种测试已经不再时髦,在很多社区实际上已经被禁止。

  然而,反常的是,在加利福尼亚,最近就有一群黑人父母提起诉讼,认为州政府禁止智商测试使他们的孩子得不到这种测试的机会,是对他们孩子的歧视。(他们正确地认为,智商测试是判断孩子是否适合特殊教育的一种有效方法。)因此法官至少是部分撤消了原判。

  这种争论就这样不断地继续下去。对少数民族的孩子来说,智力测试对他们有益还是有害?我们一直都对这种测试持支持的态度,甚至推动其实施。任何一种肤色或种族的孩子如果在学校表现不佳,对于我们来说,知道这是因为他或她的智力低下,还是别的什么原因是很重要的。

  为了改变孩子表现不佳,学校和家庭所能做的事情会受到这种的原因的影响。评价孩子的身体条件或智力水平不是歧视。

  令人遗憾的是,智力水平似乎是一个敏感的话题,而法律允许我们做的事情也会随时间的变化而变化。同样的反复也会出现在智力以外的其他领域。比如,大约在30年以前,白人家庭得到鼓励收养黑人儿童。否则就被认为是有种族歧视之嫌。

  后来这种时尚改变了,这种跨种族的收养一般不再流行,社会机构认为,黑人孩子只应回到黑人家庭。很难说什么方式是最好的,但是肯定需要我们所有人都表现出善意。

  就智力而言,我们的观点是,我们对任一个孩子的智力水平了解得越多,对这个孩子就越有利。

  测试题

  1. Why did the intelligence test become unpopular in the past few decades?

  A) Its validity was challenged by many communities.

  B) It was considered discriminative against minority children.

  C) It met with strong opposition from the majority of black parents.

  D) It deprived the black children of their rights to a good education.

  2. The recent legal action taken by some black parents in California aimed to

  A) draw public attention to IQ testing

  B) put an end to special education

  C) remove the states ban on intelligence tests

  D) have their children enter white schools

  3. The author believes that intelligence testing_____________.

  A) may ease racial confrontation in the United States

  B) can encourage black children to keep up with white children

  C) may seriously aggravate racial discrimination in the United States

  D) can help black parents make decisions about their children s education

  4. The authors opinion of child adoption seems to be that________________.

  A) no rules whatsoever can be prescribed

  B) white families should adopt black children

  C) adoption should be based on IQ test results

  D) cross-racial adoption is to be advocated

  5. Child adoption is mentioned in the passage to show that_________________.

  A) good will may sometimes complicate racial problems

  B)social surroundings are vital to the healthy growth of children

  C) intelligence testing also applies to non-academic areas

  D) American opinion can shift when it comes to sensitive issues

  选项翻译与答案详解

  1.过去的几十年当中,为什么智力测验不受欢迎?

  A)很多社群质疑智力测验的有效性。

  B)智力测验被视作歧视少数儿童。

  C)智力测验受到了来自大多数黑人父母的反对。

  D)智力测验剥夺了黑人孩子受良好教育的权利。

  根据文章第2段 有些人认为智力测验对少数民族儿童不公平。因此,在过去的几十年里,智力测验已不再流行,在有些社区甚至被禁止了 ,这里的it指代前面的intelligence testing。因此,B与文章所表达的意思一致。

  2.最近一些加州的黑人父母采取的法律行动是旨在__________________。

  A)引起大众对智力测验的关注 B)结束特殊教育

  C)消除加州的智力测验禁令 D)让自己的孩子进入白人学校就读

  根据文章第3段第2句 最近,一群黑人父母提出诉讼,声称该州禁止智商测验剥夺了他们的孩子接受这种测验的机会,是对孩子的歧视 ,由此可判断黑人父母要求取消对智力测试的禁令。故此,应该选C。

  3.作者认为智力测验________________。

  A)会缓和美国的种族对抗

  B)能够鼓励黑人孩子赶上白人该子

  C)会严重地激化美国的种族歧视

  D)可以帮助黑人家长决定孩子的教育问题

  根据文章第4段末句和第5段首句 如果任何一种肤色的小孩在学校的成绩不好,弄清楚是由于他的智商低.还是由于其他原因引起的对我们来说似乎很重要;学校和家庭只有弄清楚孩子成绩不好的原因才能帮助孩子 ,因此,应选D。

  4.作者对于收养儿童的意见似乎是____________________。

  A)没有什么法则可出台 B)白人家庭应该收养黑人孩子

  C)收养应该基于智力测验的结果之上 D)应该倡导跨种族收养

  根据文章第7段末句 因此,很难说到底怎样才是最好的。但肯定无疑的是,我们大家都需要有善意 ,由此可推断,人们并不能制定某种规则来限制它,故此,A与文章的意思相符。

  5.文章中提到收养儿童是为了显示_______________。

  A)良好的意愿有的时候会将种族问题复杂化

  B)社会环境对于儿童的健康成长至关重要

  C)智力测验对于非学术领域也同样适用

  D)美国人对于敏感议题的意见会发生变化

  文章第6段前两句,作者提出 智商水平似乎是个敏感的问题。法律允许我们不时改变观点。在智商以外的其他领域也存在着这种来来回回不断变化的情况 ,儿童收养问题只是作者举的一个例子,旨在说明在一些敏感问题上,人们的观点可以不断变化的情况。故选D。

  

信息流广告 周易 易经 代理招生 二手车 网络营销 旅游攻略 非物质文化遗产 查字典 社区团购 精雕图 戏曲下载 抖音代运营 易学网 互联网资讯 成语 成语故事 诗词 工商注册 注册公司 抖音带货 云南旅游网 网络游戏 代理记账 短视频运营 在线题库 国学网 知识产权 抖音运营 雕龙客 雕塑 奇石 散文 自学教程 常用文书 河北生活网 好书推荐 游戏攻略 心理测试 石家庄人才网 考研真题 汉语知识 心理咨询 手游安卓版下载 兴趣爱好 网络知识 十大品牌排行榜 商标交易 单机游戏下载 短视频代运营 宝宝起名 范文网 电商设计 免费发布信息 服装服饰 律师咨询 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 经典范文 优质范文 工作总结 二手车估价 实用范文 古诗词 衡水人才网 石家庄点痣 养花 名酒回收 石家庄代理记账 女士发型 搜搜作文 石家庄人才网 钢琴入门指法教程 词典 围棋 chatGPT 读后感 玄机派 企业服务 法律咨询 chatGPT国内版 chatGPT官网 励志名言 河北代理记账公司 文玩 语料库 游戏推荐 男士发型 高考作文 PS修图 儿童文学 买车咨询 工作计划 礼品厂 舟舟培训 IT教程 手机游戏推荐排行榜 暖通,电地暖, 女性健康 苗木供应 ps素材库 短视频培训 优秀个人博客 包装网 创业赚钱 养生 民间借贷律师 绿色软件 安卓手机游戏 手机软件下载 手机游戏下载 单机游戏大全 免费软件下载 石家庄论坛 网赚 手游下载 游戏盒子 职业培训 资格考试 成语大全 英语培训 艺术培训 少儿培训 苗木网 雕塑网 好玩的手机游戏推荐 汉语词典 中国机械网 美文欣赏 红楼梦 道德经 标准件 电地暖 网站转让 鲜花 书包网 英语培训机构 电商运营
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产亚洲精品自在久久不卡 | 免费看国产曰批40分钟 | 极品美女一级毛片免费 | 亚洲国产精品无码第一区二区三区 | 黄色高清视频在线观看 | 成人天堂av | 毛片网站免费 | 色偷偷色噜噜狠狠网站30根 | 欧美成人精品三级在线观看 | 久9久9精品视频在线观看 | 无码乱码av天堂一区二区 | 91精品久久久久久久久中文字幕 | 中国熟妇牲交视频 | 四虎影视成人精品 | 91免费精品国自产拍在线可以看 | 香蕉欧美成人精品a∨在线观看 | 日韩欧美在线视频 | 免费毛片a | 亚洲mm色国产网站 | 亚洲精品一区二区久久久久 | 四虎免费在线观看 | 亚欧成人毛片一区二区三区四区 | 狠狠亚洲狠狠欧洲2019 | 日本高清福利视频在线观看 | 四虎影视免费在线 | 国产免费叼嘿网站免费 | 深夜福利视频在线观看免费视频 | 成人亚洲精品久久久久 | 免费激情小视频 | 亚洲 中文字幕 日韩 无码 | 亚洲av日韩av不卡在线观看 | 能直接看的一级欧美毛片 | 亚洲精品影院久久久久久 | 国产精品区牛牛影院 | 青青草原影院 | 麻豆精品传媒一二三区 | 伊人色综合久久成人 | 亚洲美女视频 | 黑人糟蹋人妻hd中文字幕 | 国产96在线 | 欧美 | 黄动漫在线观看网站 |